Mark RadarMARK RADAR
About
EN
Sign in

FDIC Defeats SVB Parent Trust’s $1.71 Billion Claim

1 reports · First detected 2026-09-01 · Last active 2026-09-01

Silicon Valley Bank failed on March 10, 2023, with about $209 billion in assets, becoming one of the largest bank collapses in U.S. history. Rapid interest-rate increases exposed at least $4.52 billion of losses in its portfolio of long-dated government and mortgage-backed securities, helping trigger a run by depositors, many of whose balances were uninsured. The failure disrupted technology startups and became a defining case of how concentrated funding and poorly managed duration risk can destabilize a bank.

On Aug. 31, 2026, U.S. District Judge Beth Labson Freeman in San Jose ruled after a 12-day bench trial that SVB Financial Trust could not pursue a $1.71 billion claim against the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Freeman found that former executives, encouraged by the board, were negligent in taking excessive interest-rate and liquidity risks. She rejected arguments that the business judgment rule shielded the directors or that the FDIC caused the losses by selling securities, placing responsibility on the holding company’s successor.

All Coverage

1 original reports

The Backstory

The history behind this event
SVB Parent and FDIC Go to Trial Over $1.7 Billion in Deposits2026-07-01 · 1 reports · similarity 0.90

Silicon Valley Bank was closed and taken over by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation on March 10, 2023, and its parent, SVB Financial Group, filed for bankruptcy a week later. Its successor, SVB Financial Trust, is seeking the return of roughly $1.7 billion left at the bank. The outcome will affect recoveries for bankruptcy creditors and losses to the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund.

The trial began on June 29, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. At issue is whether the FDIC can offset the $1.7 billion deposit based on alleged mismanagement. The FDIC accuses management of buying large amounts of long-dated fixed-income securities, selling hedging positions and paying $294 million in dividends in the months before the collapse. The trust argues that the decisions were reasonable. The trial is expected to last several weeks, with more former senior executives due to testify.

Mark Radar|MARK RADAR

If you search news on Google, you can set Mark Radar as a preferred source—our coverage will show up more often in your results. Set as preferred source on Google →

All times are in Taipei time (GMT+8)