Digital Channels Force Rethink of Financial-Crime Risk
Banks once built financial-crime controls around branches, telephone banking, card networks and conventional payment rails, where customer identity and transaction paths were comparatively visible. Digital onboarding, mobile-first platforms, instant transfers, APIs, embedded finance and crypto access have fragmented that model. The resulting speed, scale and opacity can widen exposure to fraud, money laundering, terrorist financing and proliferation financing, while third-party providers make it harder for regulated firms to see and control risks across the customer journey.
Arctic Intelligence said on Sept. 9, 2026 that many firms still rely on a face-to-face versus non-face-to-face classification that fails to capture modern channel risk. It urged institutions to assess behavior, data, intermediaries, transaction speed and digital complexity, including velocity spikes, cross-channel switching and small fund movements. A Sept. 11 follow-up said FinTech partners, payment facilitators, banking-as-a-service providers, digital wallets and crypto exchanges add control gaps, even as accountability remains with regulated entities. The reports disclosed no transaction, fine or monetary amount.
All Coverage
2 original reportsThe Backstory
The history behind this eventDigital Payments Outpace Legacy Financial Crime Models
The rapid adoption of digital payments, instant transfers and embedded finance has made moving money faster and more convenient, while giving fraudsters new ways to operate across accounts, platforms and jurisdictions. Many banks still rely on static risk models built around isolated products and periodic reviews. Those systems can miss interconnected signals involving customers, devices and transaction networks, leaving financial institutions less equipped to detect fraud, money laundering and account abuse in real time.
A recent report warns that modern financial-crime risk is expanding at a compound, potentially exponential rate as digital transactions proliferate. It did not identify a specific institution, loss amount or incident date. The report argues that firms relying on siloed assessments will struggle to contain emerging threats, and calls for continuous monitoring, integrated data and dynamic risk scoring that can adjust as transaction patterns and criminal tactics change.
Subscribe to Mark Radar Weekly
Every Friday, the week's strongest signals in your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.
If you search news on Google, you can set Mark Radar as a preferred source—our coverage will show up more often in your results. Set as preferred source on Google →