Michael Saylor Says Quantum Threat to Bitcoin Is at Least 10 Years Away

Bitcoin uses elliptic-curve digital signatures to protect private keys and authorize transactions. If a large-scale quantum computer could use Shor’s algorithm to break public-key cryptography, assets could be transferred without authorization. The threat extends beyond Bitcoin, forcing Web3 to reassess the underlying security of wallets, nodes and cross-chain protocols.

The latest assessments indicate that quantum computers could threaten the security of Bitcoin private keys within the next 5–8 years. The Web3 ecosystem is therefore accelerating adoption of the post-quantum cryptography standards published by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in August 2024. Reports have not disclosed the cost of the migration or a firm completion date.

Bitcoin transactions rely on elliptic-curve digital signatures. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could use Shor's algorithm to derive a private key from a public key, leaving older addresses whose keys have already been exposed at greatest risk. A February 2026 estimate put nearly 7 million BTC at risk, including about 1 million attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto, with a combined value of about $440 billion. The issue has implications for holders' property rights and consensus across the network.

On June 13, 2026, an independent quantum computing advisory board convened by Coinbase said quantum computers could not yet break Bitcoin but urged immediate planning for quantum-resistant signatures. It estimated that about 6.7 million BTC was at risk but did not endorse freezing or restricting older coins. A May 6 report from Project Eleven set 2033 as its baseline year for Q-Day, with 2030 as the earliest scenario.

Bitcoin transactions use elliptic-curve digital signatures to secure assets. A quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could potentially derive private keys from public keys, putting older wallets and transaction security at risk. Ethereum, by contrast, has planned a mechanism allowing accounts to adopt quantum-resistant signatures, bringing corporate crypto treasury strategies and onchain governance capabilities into focus.

Google Quantum AI and other institutions published research on March 30, 2026, estimating that fewer than 500,000 physical qubits could crack a key in about nine minutes. Citi warned on May 18 that the potential attack timeline had shortened. Bit Digital had already announced on July 7, 2025, that it would sell about 280 Bitcoin and, alongside a $172 million fundraising, increase its holdings to 100,603 Ethereum.

Bitcoin uses elliptic-curve cryptography to protect assets and communications, but sufficiently powerful quantum computers could eventually break its current encryption. Experts say the more immediate danger is a “harvest now, decrypt later” strategy, in which attackers intercept and store large volumes of encrypted communications today, then recover sensitive historical data once the technology matures. The threat extends beyond wallet private keys.

Security experts and an early-stage venture investor have recently warned that historical communications and infrastructure data across the Bitcoin ecosystem may already be targets for quantum attacks. Ethereum has begun work on a post-quantum migration, but as of this report, neither Bitcoin nor related companies had publicly committed to specific safeguards, disclosed investment amounts or set completion dates. The upgrade timetable and division of responsibility therefore remain unclear.

Bitcoin currently relies on ECDSA and Schnorr signatures to secure asset ownership. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could eventually use Shor’s algorithm to derive private keys from exposed public keys. Although the threat remains confined to laboratory experiments, migrating the network’s wallets, software and users would take considerable time, making early development of quantum-resistant safeguards critical to asset security.

Speaking at Paris Blockchain Week on April 16, 2026, Blockstream CEO Adam Back advocated introducing an optional upgrade first and giving users 10 years to move funds to quantum-resistant addresses. He estimated that a real threat remains at least 20 years away. Blockstream’s research division proposed a hash-based signature scheme in December 2025. The migration could also clarify whether the roughly 500,000 to 1 million Bitcoin attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto can still be moved.

Bitcoin uses elliptic-curve digital signatures to prove asset ownership. If a large-scale quantum computer could use Shor's algorithm to derive private keys, older addresses whose public keys have been exposed could be vulnerable to theft. Wall Street research and brokerage firm Bernstein said the risk is concentrated in Satoshi-era wallets holding about 1.7 million BTC, rather than posing an immediate threat to mining or the entire network.

Bernstein said on April 8, 2026, that Google had cut its estimate of the number of qubits needed to break the cryptography by about 20-fold to fewer than 500,000, but Bitcoin still had three to five years to upgrade. On April 13, the firm said BTC's nearly 50% retreat from its October 2025 peak of $126,198 had already priced in most of the quantum risk. The real challenge, it said, lies in securing community consensus and migrating wallets.

Bitcoin uses a proof-of-work mechanism, and an attacker controlling more than 50% of the network’s computing power could theoretically reorganize its transaction history. An academic research team found that while quantum computing could accelerate calculations, a 51% attack on Bitcoin mining would still face physical constraints including hardware scale, cooling and energy supply, limiting the near-term threat.

As of July 20, 2026, the latest research estimates that a quantum computer powerful enough to overwhelm the entire Bitcoin network could require energy on the scale of a star, putting such a system beyond what existing institutions could deploy with funding alone. A more practical risk is the compromise of older wallets whose public keys remain exposed. Bitcoin developers have begun exploring quantum-resistant signatures and network upgrades.

Bitcoin uses public- and private-key cryptography to verify asset ownership and transactions. If powerful quantum computers become capable of deriving private keys from public keys, assets held at some addresses could be stolen. John Martinis, a Nobel physics laureate and former head of quantum hardware at Google, said the risk now raises questions about Bitcoin’s long-term security and its capacity for decentralized governance.

Martinis recently warned that quantum computers could become capable of breaking Bitcoin’s public-key cryptography within the next 5 to 10 years, and that the community should not wait for an attack before responding. He called for early planning on post-quantum cryptography, software upgrades and asset-migration mechanisms. The reports did not provide an exact publication date, the value of assets at risk or the scale of quantum computer that could break Bitcoin in practice.

Quantum computers could theoretically derive private keys from public keys exposed on-chain, allowing attackers to forge signatures and steal assets. Cybersecurity organization Project Eleven estimates that about 7 million Bitcoin may face long-term exposure, worth roughly $470 billion at recent prices. Most wallets whose public keys have not been revealed are currently unaffected, however, meaning the risk does not extend across the entire network.

Galaxy Digital research head Alex Thorn said on March 19, 2026, that the quantum threat was real but did not yet pose an existential crisis for Bitcoin. Research analyst Will Owens added on March 20 that related proposals had increased markedly since late 2025. Developers are advancing quantum-resistant addresses, BIP 360 and phased upgrade plans, while investors should currently view the issue as a long-term technical challenge.

Quantum computers capable of breaking Bitcoin's current elliptic-curve digital signatures could potentially steal assets from older addresses whose public keys have been exposed, including holdings attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto. The threat is therefore seen as existential. Martin Gaspar, senior crypto market strategist at FalconX, compared the issue with the 2021 controversy over the energy use and climate impact of Bitcoin's proof-of-work system, which also weighed on investor confidence.

In an analysis published by CoinDesk on March 4, 2026, Gaspar noted that Strategy announced a quantum-security initiative on February 5 as Bitcoin plunged toward $60,000. Coinbase also established a quantum computing and blockchain working group, while Project Eleven and BTQ Technologies are developing post-quantum technology. Gaspar said quantum concerns would recede like the earlier climate panic as the industry provides data, protection recommendations and migration plans.