Mark RadarMARK RADAR
About
EN
Sign in

Custodia Loses Fed Master Account Challenge as Kraken Wins Limited Access

2 reports · First detected 2026-03-14 · Last active 2026-03-14

A master account allows a financial institution to use Federal Reserve payment rails such as Fedwire directly, without going through a correspondent bank, affecting settlement costs and liquidity. Wyoming-chartered digital asset bank Custodia applied in October 2020 and sued in June 2022. The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City rejected its application in 2023, prompting a dispute over whether a regional Fed bank could decide independently whether to approve or deny access.

On March 13, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit voted 7–3 to deny an en banc rehearing, ending Custodia’s main avenue of appeal after a nearly five-year fight and preserving the Federal Reserve’s ultimate discretion. By contrast, the Kansas City Fed approved a limited, one-year account for Kraken Financial on March 4. The account pays no interest and does not permit overdrafts, while the Federal Reserve is considering a uniform nationwide policy.

All Coverage

2 original reports

The Backstory

The history behind this event
Blockchain Association Backs Custodia’s Supreme Court Fight for Fed Access2026-08-19 · 4 reports · similarity 0.84

A Federal Reserve master account gives a bank direct access to payment and settlement rails including Fedwire, FedNow and FedACH. Wyoming-chartered digital-asset lender Custodia Bank applied to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in October 2020 but was denied in January 2023 over safety and soundness concerns tied to its crypto-focused model. The dispute tests whether regional Reserve Banks can effectively override state chartering decisions by withholding access to critical financial infrastructure.

Custodia filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court on July 10, 2026, challenging a Tenth Circuit ruling that regional Reserve Banks have discretion to reject master-account applications. The Blockchain Association filed an amicus brief on Aug. 12, warning that such authority could be used to squeeze lawful digital-asset businesses out of the banking system. The deadline for the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City to respond has been extended to Sept. 11.

Digital-Asset Bank Custodia Petitions U.S. Supreme Court2026-07-11 · 1 reports · similarity 0.81

Digital-asset bank Custodia applied to the Federal Reserve for a master account in October 2020, seeking direct access to the U.S. dollar payment system without relying on intermediaries. The Fed rejected the application, citing the high risks posed by the bank’s business model. At issue is whether the Fed has authority, immune from judicial review, to approve or deny accounts for state-chartered banks—a question with direct implications for the future of the cryptocurrency industry and emerging digital banks.

After losing several rounds in court, Custodia formally petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court in July 2026 to challenge a March ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The appeals court voted 7–3 to uphold the Fed’s denial. The Supreme Court is expected to decide in October 2026 whether to hear the case, which has become a landmark clash between traditional finance and the crypto industry.

Mark Radar|MARK RADAR

If you search news on Google, you can set Mark Radar as a preferred source—our coverage will show up more often in your results. Set as preferred source on Google →

All times are in Taipei time (GMT+8)