Kalshi Backs AFM Push for Federal Prediction Market Law to Counter Gambling Industry Dominance

Kalshi operates a federally regulated prediction market where users trade event contracts tied to outcomes including elections, economic data and sports. Its rapid rise has pushed prediction markets toward the financial mainstream while sharpening a long-running dispute over whether some contracts are derivatives under Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversight or wagers subject to state gambling laws.

US visits to Kalshi surged more than 1,500% over the past year, while nominal trading volume topped about $40 billion in August as demand for sports and other event contracts accelerated. The expansion has also intensified legal pressure from federal authorities and state gaming regulators, creating a test of how far Kalshi can grow under its federal market status while operating across jurisdictions with separate gambling restrictions.

Kalshi operates a federally regulated prediction market where traders buy event contracts tied to outcomes including U.S. elections. Its rules bar anyone who can directly or indirectly influence an event — such as a political candidate — from trading contracts on that outcome. The restriction is central to limiting conflicts of interest and potential misuse of nonpublic information as election markets grow and face scrutiny over whether their controls match those of traditional financial exchanges.

Kalshi said on Aug. 31, 2026, that Laurie Buckhout, the Republican nominee for North Carolina’s 1st Congressional District, bought less than $1,000 of contracts on her own race after launching her campaign in December 2025. A settlement effective Aug. 28 suspended her for three years and imposed a $2,589.96 penalty. Buckhout, a retired Army colonel running against Democratic Rep. Don Davis in November, cooperated with the investigation and called the trade a “dumb mistake.”

Kalshi is a CFTC-registered designated contract market that lets users trade event contracts tied to sports, elections and other outcomes. Its legal strategy rests on federal pre-emption: the company argues the Commodity Exchange Act gives the Commodity Futures Trading Commission exclusive authority over its exchange, while states contend much of the activity is gambling subject to local licensing and consumer-protection laws. The outcome will determine whether prediction markets can operate under one national framework or face a state-by-state patchwork.

On Aug. 13, King County Superior Court Judge John McHale ordered Kalshi to block Washington users from most contracts, requiring initial IP and residency geofencing by Aug. 19 and a multi-source system by Sept. 2. Kalshi sought reconsideration on Aug. 20, citing Washington’s decision not to enforce equivalent restrictions against Crypto.com pending appeal. Separately, 44 state attorneys general challenged the CFTC’s 267-page proposed rule after comments closed July 27. The CFTC invoked emergency authority on Aug. 11 to keep Kalshi operating amid New York’s July 31 suit, which seeks more than $36 billion in damages.

Kalshi is a prediction-market platform regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that allows users to trade contracts based on sporting-event outcomes. Illinois has subjected such products to state sports-betting restrictions, sparking a dispute over whether federal derivatives oversight preempts state intervention. The outcome could also affect how prediction markets operate across states.

Kalshi recently sued Illinois officials to challenge a provision in the state's newly enacted budget bill that is scheduled to take effect on July 1. The company argues that restrictions on sporting-event contracts encroach on the CFTC's exclusive regulatory authority. It is seeking to block enforcement, saying the provision would immediately restrict its products and cause irreparable harm that monetary damages could not adequately remedy.

Kalshi structures outcomes in sports, elections and other areas as event contracts and operates as a designated contract market regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). Minnesota, however, considers the activity gambling subject to state law. The dispute centers on whether the Commodity Exchange Act grants exclusive federal jurisdiction that preempts the state ban under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. The outcome could reshape regulatory boundaries nationwide.

Governor Tim Walz signed SF 4760 on May 18, 2026, before replacing it with SF 3432 on May 26. Effective August 1, the law makes operating, facilitating or advertising prediction markets a felony. The CFTC sued on May 19 and sought an injunction, followed by Kalshi on May 27. Kalshi also argued that the advertising restrictions violate the First Amendment. The litigation is expected to continue through appeals and could ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Kalshi is a designated contract market regulated by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that offers event contracts tied to outcomes including sports results. The Ohio Casino Control Commission considers such products to be sports betting that requires a license, prompting Kalshi to sue in October 2025. The dispute centers on whether federal derivatives regulation preempts state intervention, and its outcome could also affect platforms such as Polymarket.

On May 12, 2026, the CFTC filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit supporting Kalshi’s challenge to a federal district court’s March 2026 denial of an injunction. The CFTC called Ohio’s action a “jurisdictional overreach” and asked the court to affirm its exclusive authority over event contracts offered on designated contract markets. The filing marks the agency’s second intervention in a similar case, following its support for Crypto.com in the Ninth Circuit in February.

Kalshi is a prediction-market exchange under the federal oversight of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), allowing users to trade contracts on the outcomes of political, economic and other events. Its compliance strategy differs from that of crypto-native platform Polymarket, shaping a broader industry debate over whether prediction markets should fall under the federal financial system or be regulated separately by individual states.

The latest data show Kalshi controlling about 89% of the U.S. prediction market, reflecting the lead gained by its regulated trading model. The report did not provide a cutoff date for the data or disclose trading volumes or values. Attention will now turn to the legal and regulatory cases facing Kalshi and Polymarket, as well as the boundary between federal and state jurisdiction.