Bitcoin, Ethereum Speed Quantum-Safe Shift as U.S. Backs Hardware

Bitcoin and Ethereum rely on elliptic-curve digital signatures to secure transactions and asset ownership. If quantum computers become substantially larger and more stable, they could theoretically derive private keys. The U.S. Commerce Department’s support for the quantum industry therefore has implications beyond technological competition and is adding pressure on the crypto sector to accelerate its adoption of post-quantum cryptography.

As of July 20, 2026, the U.S. Commerce Department planned to invest more than $2 billion in nine quantum-computing companies to help scale the technology. The development has renewed concerns about the security of Bitcoin and Ethereum. Experts are calling for prompt planning of Post-Quantum Cryptography upgrades and closer coordination among governments, regulators and developer communities.

Bitcoin transactions use elliptic-curve digital signatures to secure assets. A quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm could potentially derive private keys from public keys, putting older wallets and transaction security at risk. Ethereum, by contrast, has planned a mechanism allowing accounts to adopt quantum-resistant signatures, bringing corporate crypto treasury strategies and onchain governance capabilities into focus.

Google Quantum AI and other institutions published research on March 30, 2026, estimating that fewer than 500,000 physical qubits could crack a key in about nine minutes. Citi warned on May 18 that the potential attack timeline had shortened. Bit Digital had already announced on July 7, 2025, that it would sell about 280 Bitcoin and, alongside a $172 million fundraising, increase its holdings to 100,603 Ethereum.

Bitcoin currently protects assets with ECDSA and Schnorr signatures. If a large-scale quantum computer could run Shor’s algorithm, it might be able to derive private keys from public keys that have already been exposed. Project Eleven estimates that about $2.3 trillion in assets is at risk, making a post-quantum migration critical to the security of the entire wallet, exchange and custody ecosystem.

Project Eleven CEO Alex Pruden told CoinDesk’s Consensus Miami on May 6, 2026, that Bitcoin developers should immediately move post-quantum signatures from research into production. The Taproot upgrade took about five years and migration was voluntary. A new approach would require participation from all holders, wallets, exchanges and institutions, while BIP-360 has already laid the groundwork for a quantum-resistant output type.

Bitcoin currently relies on ECDSA and Schnorr signatures to secure asset ownership. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could eventually use Shor’s algorithm to derive private keys from exposed public keys. Although the threat remains confined to laboratory experiments, migrating the network’s wallets, software and users would take considerable time, making early development of quantum-resistant safeguards critical to asset security.

Speaking at Paris Blockchain Week on April 16, 2026, Blockstream CEO Adam Back advocated introducing an optional upgrade first and giving users 10 years to move funds to quantum-resistant addresses. He estimated that a real threat remains at least 20 years away. Blockstream’s research division proposed a hash-based signature scheme in December 2025. The migration could also clarify whether the roughly 500,000 to 1 million Bitcoin attributed to Satoshi Nakamoto can still be moved.

Bitcoin and Ethereum rely on elliptic-curve cryptography to safeguard assets. A quantum computer capable of deriving a private key from a public key could potentially steal funds. Bitcoin activated Taproot on November 14, 2021, and because some transactions expose public keys in advance, the potential window for attack has widened.

The latest research from Google Quantum AI estimates that about 500,000 error-corrected physical qubits could be enough to crack a key within Bitcoin’s roughly nine-minute transaction confirmation window, far below previous estimates of several million qubits. No funds have been reported stolen through such an attack, but the researchers are urging the community to begin planning a migration to post-quantum cryptography.

Quantum computers could threaten Bitcoin private keys and onchain assets if they become capable of breaking today’s elliptic-curve cryptography. BOLT Technologies founder Yoon Auh said adopting post-quantum cryptography would require more than a protocol overhaul. Large numbers of wallets, exchanges and holders worldwide would also need to migrate in coordination, testing the efficiency of decentralized governance.

The latest report focuses on whether Bitcoin governance can move quickly enough to address quantum risks, comparing the upgrade capacity of decentralized networks such as Ethereum with that of centralized systems. It gives no value for the assets at risk, potential date of a quantum attack or upgrade timetable. However, it stresses that assets held at legacy addresses could remain exposed if some wallets fail to migrate, even after the core protocol is updated.

Bitcoin and Ethereum both rely on elliptic-curve cryptography to secure transaction signatures. A practical quantum computer running Shor's algorithm could potentially derive private keys from public keys. Although the threat is not imminent, migrating on-chain assets and coordinating network-wide upgrades would take years. The two communities' ability to replace their cryptographic systems will therefore shape long-term security and market confidence.

On March 26, 2026, Castle Island Ventures partner Nic Carter criticized Bitcoin's slow response. ARK Invest estimated on March 11 that one-third of BTC was at risk. Ethereum has established a post-quantum roadmap for 2029, while Google has also set 2029 as its migration deadline. Bitcoin, meanwhile, is still discussing BIP-360.