CLARITY Act Advances in Senate as Stablecoin Compromise Takes Shape

The CLARITY Act seeks to create the first comprehensive US market structure for digital assets, defining when tokens should be treated as securities or commodities and dividing oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Its significance extends beyond jurisdictional lines: negotiations over stablecoins and decentralized finance could determine whether Congress can deliver durable rules for an industry still operating under fragmented enforcement and guidance.

The Senate majority leader has moved to initiate a procedural vote, positioning the bill for a possible full-chamber vote as early as mid-September. The White House has pledged to push CLARITY across the “finish line” in September, but resistance is mounting. Senator Ruben Gallego has urged colleagues not to rush the measure, Galaxy cut its estimated odds of passage to 10%, and the CFTC and SEC are exploring joint regulatory steps should Congress fail to act.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) would establish the first broad U.S. market-structure framework for crypto, drawing regulatory lines between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and setting rules for digital commodities and trading platforms. The House passed the measure 294-134 on July 17, 2025. The Senate is negotiating its own text, and any changes would require further House action, making timing central to whether President Donald Trump can receive a final bill in 2026.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune filed cloture on the motion to proceed before the chamber left for its August 2026 recess, setting a 2:15 p.m. vote for Sept. 15. Advancing the bill will require 60 votes, while negotiators still have to settle provisions covering public officials’ crypto conflicts, stablecoin rewards, decentralized finance and illicit-finance safeguards. September also brings government-funding work and other competing priorities. With the Nov. 3 midterm elections approaching, another delay could leave too little floor time to reconcile the Senate and House versions this year.

The US Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, known as the CLARITY Act, seeks to establish a federal framework for crypto markets and clarify oversight between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Bipartisan passage would give digital-asset firms a clearer compliance path in the US, while supporters also view regulated stablecoins as a strategic tool for preserving the dollar’s role in global digital finance.

Coinbase’s head of institutional strategy, John D’Agostino, said bipartisan negotiations have entered their final stage, with industry groups and other stakeholders seeking an agreement before Congress leaves for its August recess. D’Agostino said stablecoins could help sustain the dollar’s international advantage and added that US community banks are increasingly pursuing partnerships with crypto companies, signaling broader engagement between traditional lenders and the digital-asset sector.

As the United States advances the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or CLARITY Act, to regulate stablecoins, the boundary between traditional finance and cryptocurrency is being redrawn. Banks fear that if the bill allows issuers to offer interest or yield indirectly, payment stablecoins would effectively become substitutes for deposits. That would threaten traditional banks' funding sources and could weaken the banking system's lending capacity, prompting strong resistance and calls for amendments from the traditional financial sector.

On July 13, 2026, the American Bankers Association, the Independent Community Bankers of America and other groups sent a joint letter to Senate leaders seeking revisions to ambiguous stablecoin yield language in Section 404 of the bill. The ICBA warned that failure to close the loophole could drain as much as $1.3 trillion in bank deposits and reduce lending capacity by $850 billion. The bill passed a Senate committee in May, with a hearing scheduled for July 17.

The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 aims to establish consistent rules for the U.S. cryptocurrency spot market and clarify the regulatory roles of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Covering token classification, trading-platform compliance and stablecoin yield arrangements, the bill is seen as a key step in U.S. digital-asset market structure legislation.

The U.S. Senate Banking Committee has scheduled a May 14 markup of the bill, reviving a market structure overhaul that had stalled. A compromise on stablecoin yields and regulatory jurisdiction has won support from several crypto industry leaders. However, lawmakers remain divided over political ethics and several amendments, leaving uncertain whether the bill can advance to a vote by the full Senate.

The US Congress is considering the CLARITY Act, which seeks to clarify regulatory responsibilities for digital assets and trading platforms and reduce legal uncertainty for crypto companies. Senator Cynthia Lummis says clear rules are critical to bringing businesses back to the United States and preserving the country’s leadership in financial technology.

Lummis warned that this week could be the United States’ last critical opportunity to advance the CLARITY Act before 2030. She said China could otherwise write the rules for a new financial era. Negotiations have continued since the Senate returned, but Democrats and Republicans remain divided over provisions covering lawmakers’ ethics and safeguards against bad actors. A vote on crypto market structure could take place as early as August.

The Clarity Act is a key U.S. congressional effort to provide greater regulatory certainty for crypto assets. It aims to establish a federal regulatory framework for payment stablecoins and clarify rules governing issuance, reserve assets and regulatory jurisdiction. Because stablecoins are widely used in trading and payments, the bill’s trajectory will affect compliance costs and market strategies across the industry.

The U.S. House of Representatives recently held a markup session on the Clarity Act, reviewing and debating the bill provision by provision. Despite disputes among lawmakers over some clauses, the measure advanced to the next stages of the legislative process. Existing reports did not disclose the exact date of the meeting, the vote tally or any amounts involved. The timing of a full House vote and Senate consideration remains to be seen.

The CLARITY Act seeks to establish a US crypto-asset market structure framework and clarify the division of regulatory authority between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. If the bill reaches the full Senate, it would typically need at least 60 votes to advance, making bipartisan cooperation critical to its prospects of becoming federal law. Current polling shows that most voters support clear cryptocurrency rules.

Coinbase Vice President of Policy Kara Calvert said at Consensus 2026 that the Senate Banking Committee could take up the bill as early as the following week. The committee subsequently scheduled a markup for May 14 and voted to advance the CLARITY Act. The bill must still clear a full Senate vote, while lawmakers' dispute over crypto-asset ethics rules for government officials could affect the final timetable and bipartisan support.

US cryptocurrency regulation has long relied on securities and commodities laws as well as regulators’ discretion, leaving the boundaries around token classification and developer liability unclear. Nonprofit advocacy group Coin Center says the CLARITY Act is intended to establish a framework for classifying digital assets and provide statutory protections for noncustodial blockchain developers, determining whether the industry can operate under predictable rules.

As of July 20, 2026, the CLARITY Act and related blockchain legislation remained stalled in the US Senate, with provisions including stablecoin yield among the disputed issues. No specific amount is involved. Coin Center warned that unless Congress explicitly limits regulatory discretion, future administrations could change their enforcement stance and take tougher measures against cryptocurrency companies and developers.