U.S. Senators Urge CFTC Probe Into Polymarket Over Alleged Deceptive Marketing
Polymarket is a prediction market where event contracts allow users to trade on outcomes including elections and sporting events. On January 3, 2022, the CFTC found that it was operating an unregistered trading platform, imposed a $1.4 million penalty and ordered it to exit the United States. As the platform returns to the U.S. market, questions over whether its marketing misled consumers are also affecting the division of gambling oversight among federal, state and tribal governments.
Republican Senator John Curtis and Democratic Senator Adam Schiff wrote to CFTC Chairman Michael Selig on June 25, requesting by July 10 an explanation of whether the agency was investigating. A June 20 report reviewed more than 1,100 videos from 10 creators and found that about 70% showed simulated trades, presenting nearly $1.9 million in fictitious profits. Polymarket has begun auditing the content.
All Coverage
1 original reportsThe Backstory
The history behind this eventPolymarket Lawsuit Raises Questions Over Prediction-Market Integrity and Manipulation Risks
Decentralized prediction market Polymarket has been hailed as a truth machine. But a recent dispute over a contract asking whether MicroStrategy had sold Bitcoin exposed how such platforms’ determinations of fact can be highly vulnerable to after-the-fact rule interpretations, biased oracle voting and manipulation by large traders. It has also revived a regulatory debate over whether prediction markets should be treated as online gambling or financial derivatives venues.
The dispute began in May 2026, when MicroStrategy sold 32 Bitcoin before the May 31 deadline but did not report the transaction until June 1. Polymarket subsequently changed the rules and resolved the market as “No,” prompting fierce investor backlash. In July 2026, several traders who had backed “Yes” filed a class-action lawsuit against the platform in New York, alleging breach of contract and fraud and accusing it of depriving investors of legitimate gains through a biased decision.
Polymarket Plans US Marketing Blitz to Rebuild Trust on Return to Market
Polymarket allows users to trade on the probabilities of outcomes in politics, sports and other events. On January 3, 2022, the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission fined the company $1.4 million for offering event-based binary options without registration and ordered it to stop serving US customers. That regulatory history has made compliance and market credibility central to the platform’s return.
A July 8, 2026, report said Polymarket was marketing itself in the United States through TikTok influencers, X and partnerships with Major League Baseball, CNBC and CNN, among others. Its X account had about 1.7 million followers. The company acquired CFTC-licensed exchange QCEX for $112 million in July 2025 and launched a regulated real-money sports prediction app at the end of that year. However, just one month before the report, influencers were found not to have clearly disclosed sponsorships.
South Korean Regulator Weighs Action Against Polymarket
Polymarket is a prediction-market platform where users trade on the outcomes of political, economic and other events, with contract prices reflecting market-implied probabilities. The Korea Communications Standards Commission is considering restricting the service over concerns that it may constitute illegal gambling and encourage highly speculative activity. The case also raises questions about where prediction markets fall within the boundaries of financial-trading and gambling regulation.
As of July 20, 2026, the commission said it would hear Polymarket's representations before deciding whether to take corrective action. It has not announced a decision date, fines or any amount involved. Polymarket already faces varying degrees of access restrictions and regulatory scrutiny in countries including the United States, Britain and France.
Polymarket Accused of Paying Creators to Film Fake Profit Videos
Polymarket is a prediction market where users trade crypto assets based on the outcomes of events, attracting customers with contracts tied to politics, sports and other topics. A Wall Street Journal investigation said the platform appeared to have paid college content creators to execute sham trades on highly realistic simulation sites, presenting fabricated profits as genuine betting experiences. The allegations raise questions about advertising disclosures and consumer trust.
The investigation found more than 1,000 promotional videos showing fake bets and profits, even though the creators had not assumed the risks claimed in the footage. Polymarket said it would conduct a comprehensive review of the content. During the 2026 World Cup, a “mystery wallet” was also said to have placed highly accurate bets and made NT$24 million in arbitrage profits, renewing scrutiny of whether the platform uses misleading promotions to attract users.
US House Democrats Call for FTC Probe Into Prediction Markets
Prediction markets allow users to trade contracts tied to the outcomes of real-world events. After Kalshi and Polymarket began offering sports-event contracts in 2025, the industry grew into a billion-dollar market within a year. At the heart of the controversy is that platforms have told courts and regulators their products can be used for investment and hedging while marketing them to consumers as legal betting. The dispute raises questions over the respective authority of the CFTC and local gambling regulators, as well as consumer protection.
On June 3, 2026, nine Democratic members of the US House of Representatives, including Kevin Mullin and Gabe Vasquez, sent a letter asking the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate misleading advertising and consumer complaints and consider possible enforcement action. They requested a response by June 29. The letter cited a March poll in which 61% of respondents said event contracts were more akin to gambling, while 81% considered wagering on sports prediction markets to be gambling.
Polymarket Files Parlay Contract Certification With CFTC as SEC Seeks Input on Prediction-Market ETFs
Polymarket is a prediction-market platform where participants trade contracts tied to the outcomes of political, economic and other events. The proposed product uses a parlay structure combining multiple outcomes. The regulatory positions of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) will influence whether prediction markets can enter the mainstream financial-products ecosystem.
Polymarket has submitted a self-certification filing for “combinatorial outcome contracts” to the CFTC, with a launch expected as early as May 21. The filing did not disclose any trading amount. Meanwhile, SEC Chair Paul Atkins announced a public request for input on new fund products, including event-contract ETFs, signaling that the regulatory debate has expanded beyond individual prediction contracts to fund structures available to retail investors.
Polymarket Seeks CFTC Approval to Return to US Market
Polymarket offers blockchain-based binary event contracts. The CFTC found that it had operated an unregistered derivatives market and, on January 3, 2022, imposed a $1.4 million penalty and ordered it to wind down noncompliant markets. Its main international platform has blocked US users since then. Lifting the ban would allow Polymarket to challenge regulated rival Kalshi in the United States with its full product offering.
Bloomberg reported on April 28 that Polymarket was negotiating with CFTC Chairman Michael Selig to amend the 2022 settlement terms and allow US traders back onto its international platform. The company has spent $112 million to acquire licensed exchange QCEX and launched the regulated Polymarket US in late 2025. It also filed a self-certification with the CFTC for sports parlay contracts on May 20, but reopening the main platform to US users still requires regulatory approval.
Manipulation Risks Raise Concerns Over Integrity of Polymarket and Other Prediction Platforms
Prediction markets such as Polymarket pool participants’ money to produce collective forecasts and are often viewed as providing more immediate probability signals than opinion polls. But if traders can personally cause a contract’s conditions to be met, prices no longer predict reality and instead reward intervention. The issue could determine whether the platforms win the trust of retail investors, attract institutional capital and secure regulatory acceptance.
On March 22, 2026, a CoinDesk column argued that platforms should not list contracts whose outcomes can be triggered at low cost by a single participant. Another column on March 25 said Polymarket converts cross-chain assets into USDC.e for trading on Polygon. Reuters had reported on March 2 that wagers on contracts covering the timing of an attack on Iran and Khamenei’s tenure reached $529 million and $150 million, respectively, fueling concerns about insider trading and manipulation.
Subscribe to Mark Radar Weekly
Every Friday, the week's strongest signals in your inbox. Unsubscribe anytime.